Officials react to allegations of civilians impersonating ICE

Officials react to allegations of civilians impersonating ICE

Spread the love

One San Diego County supervisor is concerned about civilians posing as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents using fake ICE clothing and tactical gear and sowing fear and discord.

Terra Lawson-Remer, chair of the Board of Supervisors, wrote in an Oct. 17 e-newsletter that she is leading efforts in the county to issue cease-and-desist letters to companies that sell fake law enforcement gear that allows members of the public to misrepresent themselves as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

“When the public can’t tell the difference between legitimate officers and impostors, everyone loses – especially the communities already targeted by exploitation and fear,” Lawson-Remer wrote in the newsletter. “In San Diego County, we’re drawing the line. We’re saying no to masked federal chaos, no to deception, and no to the idea that accountability is optional.”

Lawson-Remer described a CNN investigation conducted earlier this year about people across the country buying shirts, baseball caps, bulletproof vests and other gear that would make the wearer look like an ICE agent. The supervisor said the ability to impersonate officers is made easier by an ICE policy that allows officers to wear masks to hide their identities.

“This type of behavior from federal law enforcement creates an opening for bad actors to step in and abuse this fear,” Lawson-Remer said in the e-newsletter.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has told The Center Square that masks are necessary to protect officers.

The CNN investigation, meanwhile, found more than two dozen cases of private individuals posing as ICE officers across the country since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term. A graphic displayed in a video produced as part of that investigation shows Southern California communities as the sites where officers were impersonated.

According to that investigation, real ICE agents often conduct operations in plainclothes and drive unmarked cars – a departure from the way at least one ICE impersonator operated in Seattle. The man drove a black SUV with “ICE” painted along the sides of the car in large white letters.

Online retailers are selling items marked ‘ICE’

Amazon.com is one online retailer that is selling items labeled with the “ICE” acronym. This week, baseball caps with “ICE” sewn across the front and an American flag on the side were selling for $36.95, while other caps with just “ICE” across the front sold for as low as $14.99.

A black windbreaker with the phrase “Border Patrol” on the front and back, in bold white lettering, can be bought on Amazon for $29.99. Unlabeled bulletproof vests sell on Amazon starting at $32.99, and generic fake police badges can be bought for as low as $13.99. It’s difficult to tell what agencies the badges are supposed to represent.

Other retailers sell ICE clothing. SHEIN, the popular fast-fashion site that sells trendy clothes for extremely low prices, sells a short-sleeved women’s T-shirt that says “ICE Federal Agent” across the front in large, bold yellow letters. That T-shirt sells for $9.95 on SHEIN’s website.

Another online retailer, Shield Republic, sells a T-shirt with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security logo on the back above the letters “ICE” in large black lettering.

“These predators are using fake ICE gear, including jackets, patches, badges, and vests, that can be bought online for next to nothing,” Lawson-Remer wrote in the e-newsletter.

However, city and county staff in San Diego and Los Angeles have suggested ICE impersonators are negligible, if they exist at all.

“I’m not aware of this occurring in San Diego,” wrote Rachel Laing, a staff member of the city of San Diego, in an email to The Center Square.

Similarly, officials in Los Angeles County said they haven’t seen ICE impersonators in their communities. However, some have released statements opposing ICE officers wearing masks, which they say encourage ICE impersonators to follow suit.

Officials say the general public can’t tell the difference.

“Across the county, people are being pulled out of their cars, beaten, and ripped from their families by men in tactical gear with balaclavas, no badges, and no names,” said Janice Hahn, a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. “That’s not how law enforcement in a democracy should operate. Residents have a right to know who is stopping them, questioning them, and detaining them.”

Is any of this legal?

Impersonating an ICE officer is a felony.

And the U.S. Department of Homeland Security takes it seriously.

“Anyone caught impersonating themselves as a federal immigration agent will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” an unnamed senior DHS official wrote in an email to The Center Square on Thursday. “Impersonating a federal immigration officer endangers public safety and erodes trust in law enforcement.”

According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, 18 U.S. Code § 913 states, “Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Hedding Law Firm, which has an office in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Encino, warns against impersonating an officer.

“If you falsely represent yourself in certain situations, you could be charged with a federal criminal offense,” the firm’s website states.

Less clear is whether it’s legal for companies to sell clothing or other items with the ICE name, acronym or logo on them, or fake police badges and other gear that could be used to impersonate a federal officer.

The Media Law Resource Center said it’s all about context.

“It could be a liability issue if someone dresses in ICE insignia, and is either reasonably believed to be a member of ICE and attempting to undertake some action,” said Dave Heller, a lawyer and the center’s deputy director. “You could especially imagine, for example, any kind of vigilante act that people put on, whether it’s ICE or any other type of law enforcement garb, and have this wrongful intent to try to fool people about what they’re wearing.”

“Generally, labeling is okay so long as it doesn’t look like actual official garb,” Heller told The Center Square Thursday. “This is particularly so for state law enforcement officers that have identifiable uniforms. So the sale of ‘official’ uniforms online or elsewhere is illegal. For example, New York State Penal Law prohibits the sale of ‘any part of the [police] uniform which identifies the wearer as a member of a police department, such as the uniform, shield, badge, numbers, or other identifying insignias or emblems.’ “

Law firms largely advise the public to be careful when producing or selling clothes.

“Using names or acronyms related to U.S. government agencies requires careful consideration,” according to Midwestern law firm Keener & Associates P.C. in a website post about trademark law.

Keener & Associates P.C.’s website applies to business owners producing items that have government agency names on them. The firm warns against implying false government connections.

Lawson-Remer, the San Diego County supervisor, didn’t respond to requests for comment for this story. Neither did the others on the Board of Supervisors, San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, San Diego City Council members and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

The Center Square contacted, but did not get a response from, Amazon, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and California Attorney General Rob Bonta. The Center Square also wasn’t able to reach SHEIN or Shield Republic.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Ad-Hock-July-22nd

Finance Officials Clarify How Will County Tracks Assets, From Vehicles to Desks

Will County finance officials on Tuesday detailed the policies governing how the county tracks its physical and digital assets, explaining the $5,000 threshold for items that are formally capitalized and...
Ad-Hock-July-22nd

Will County Treasurer Confirms Free Online Tax Payment Option, Warns Against High Credit Card Fees

Will County Treasurer Tim Brophy confirmed Tuesday that property owners have a free online payment option available and advised residents to avoid the high convenience fees associated with using credit...
Ad-Hock-July-22nd

Committee Highlights ‘Lack of Teeth’ in County Code Enforcement Process

While the Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee quickly approved minor updates to its administrative adjudication ordinance Tuesday, the action sparked a broader discussion about resident frustration over the enforcement...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee for July 22, 2025

AI Policy Discussion Urged: Chair Jackie Triner called for the county to develop a comprehensive policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence. Citing a recent conference, Triner noted the potential benefits...
New-Lenox-Village-Board.1

New Lenox’s Crossroads Sports Complex Opens to Rave Reviews, On Time and Under Budget

NEW LENOX – The newly opened Crossroads Sports Complex is already proving to be a resounding success, according to a report delivered at the New Lenox Village Board meeting on...
New-Lenox-Village-Board.4

New Lenox Waives Over $13,000 in Permit Fees for Park District, Church Projects

NEW LENOX – The New Lenox Village Board unanimously approved waiving more than $13,000 in permit and plan review fees for two significant community projects during its meeting on Monday....
New-Lenox-Police.3

New Lenox Approves Site Plan for MBPRO Truck Repair on Moni Drive

NEW LENOX – The Village Board on Monday approved site modifications for a new truck repair business, MBPRO Services, set to open at 21660 South Moni Drive. The board unanimously...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary: New Lenox Board of Trustees for July 14, 2025

The New Lenox Village Board of Trustees met Monday to approve site plans for a new business, waive fees for community projects, and hear a glowing report on the new...
WCO-PZ-July-15

Crete Township Wins Approval for New Digital Sign at Community Center

Crete Township received approval from the Will County Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday for a new digital sign at its community center, a project that required a special use...
WCO-PZ-July-15

Will County Planners OK Oversized Garage Near Naperville, Overriding Staff Recommendation

The Will County Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday approved variances for a new oversized accessory garage in Wheatland Township, siding with a homeowner and builder over a staff recommendation...
WCO-PZ-July-15

Green Garden Landscaping Business Gains Permit Amid Strong Neighbor Support

A small landscaping and lawn maintenance business operating on a residential property in Green Garden Township received official approval Tuesday after neighbors voiced overwhelming support for the operation. The Will...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for July 15, 2025

Frankfort Shed Relocation Approved: A homeowner on West Harvest Drive in Frankfort Township received a variance to reduce an east side-yard setback from 10 to 4 feet. The variance, sought by...
Mokena Logo Graphic.5

Mokena Overhauls Zoning Code to Streamline Rules for Sheds, Pools, and Patios

The Mokena Village Board has unanimously approved a significant overhaul of its zoning regulations for accessory structures, a move aimed at making rules for items like sheds, decks, and pools...
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic

Frankfort Approves ‘Whisk & Flame’ Culinary Studio, Slashes Parking Requirement for Downtown Property

An experiential culinary studio named Whisk & Flame is set to open in downtown Frankfort after the Village Board approved a series of special use permits and a significant parking...
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic

Frankfort Village Board Adopts $59.4 Million Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2026

The Frankfort Village Board has formally set its maximum legal spending limit for the upcoming fiscal year, adopting a $59,366,900 appropriation ordinance for fiscal year 2026. The measure was passed...