CA Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to stop redistricting
The California Supreme Court rejected an emergency Republican petition to take congressional redistricting off the Nov. 4 ballot.
“The petition for writ of mandate and application for stay are denied,” the court said Wednesday, two days after Republicans, including several legislators, filed it.
“48 hours later, this case has already been rejected,” Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom posted on X. “Keep em coming, @GOP. We’ll keep winning.”
The GOP petition argued legislators legally can’t draw a congressional map because under the California Constitution, redistricting is done by an independent commission of citizens. The Republicans were represented in the petition by the Dhillon Law Group, which was founded by Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant U.S. attorney general heading the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division.
The Republican petitioners in the case included state Sens. Tony Strickland and Suzette Valladares and Assemblymembers Tri Ta and Kate Sanchez. Also among the petitioners were Eric Ching, Mike Ward, Andrew Pandol and Roger Holland. The petition was filed against Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a Democrat, and the Legislature.
“Redistricting as regulated by the California Constitution is not just a take-it-or-leave-it decision over a proposed map,” the petition said. “Long before a map is proposed for a final decision or certified, regardless of who draws it, redistricting is a laborious process that requires extensive technical analysis and careful balancing of complex constitutional and statutory mandates.”
Petitioners said Democrats “rammed this complex scheme in just 4 days,” violating Article IV, Section 8(a) of 30 days’ public notice of new legislation. Republicans accused Democrats of violating other parts of the state constitution as well.
“Allowing this unconstitutional measure onto the ballot would impose needless costs and uncertainty on both election officials and the public,” the petitioners said.
On Aug. 21, the court rejected a previous Republican effort to stop the Legislature from acting immediately on the redistricting plan. The Election Rigging Response Act was approved that day by the Democratic supermajorities in the California Senate and Assembly. It was immediately signed afterward by Newsom.
The legislation put Proposition 50 on the Nov. 4 ballot. Voters are being asked to amend the California Constitution to undo significant parts of the work of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission and adopt a new map designed to add five Democratic seats to the U.S. House. Newsom and other Democratic leaders have said the move is necessary to counter Texas’ redistricting efforts resulting in five additional Republican seats in the House.
In the meantime, Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher and other Republicans legislators have acted to counter California redistricting with a bill to create a new state consisting of 35, mainly inland counties. But Gallagher would need support of a number of Democrats to get his bill approved by both houses of the Legislature. If approved by the state Assembly and Senate, it would then need Congress’ approval.
Latest News Stories
Judge: SCOTUS ruling doesn’t necessarily end block on Trump DEI orders
WATCH: California attorney general talks about Prop. 50
Illinois quick hits: Man charged with threatening Trump; judge grants injunction in shelter funding case
WATCH: IL GOP Rep: Sanctuary expansion bill may expose many to civil lawsuits
Senators introduce legislation to codify Antifa terror designation
DHS proposes billion dollar expanded DNA testing for immigrants
Trump administration resumes visa processing despite shutdown
Muslims in Virginia, New York face decades in prison for supporting Houthis, ISIS
Indian reservation focus of human smuggling probe at U.S.-Canada border
WATCH: Family, friends remember Bailey family at celebration of life
WATCH: Amid criticism, Pritzker defends using expletive to tell Trump where to go
Election integrity advocates urge reform after Illinois scores low in global survey
WATCH: Pritzker’s rhetoric criticized; tax amnesty program; status of Guard lawsuit