MIT rejects White House education demands
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology refused to sign the White House agreement that would grant federal funds linked to the administration’s demands.
The Trump administration proposed a “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” to nine universities. The agreement offers special access to federal funding in exchange for commitments to eliminate racial discrimination in admissions and freeze tuition rates for the next five years, among other things.
The nine universities include: Brown University, the University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vanderbilt University, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Virginia and the University of Arizona.
The compact states the universities are not required to sign the document, but would lose federal grants if they didn’t.
MIT is the first university to refuse the demands. In a letter to the Education Secretary Linda McMahon, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced the decision.
“In our view, America’s leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence,” Kornbluth said. “In that free marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences. Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education.”
MIT will continue to support freedom of expression, the MIT president added.
“We must hear facts and opinions we don’t like — and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree,” Kornbluth wrote.
The American Association of University Professors is urging colleges to reject the proposed compact. Ariel White, vice president of MIT’s AAUP chapter, emphasized that universities should follow MIT’s lead and refuse to sign.
“The goal is to leave universities powerless and at the whim of the federal government and of the president personally and to make sure that universities cannot provide any sort of opposition to or simple disagreement with this administration,” White said. “Even if some individual parts of this deal sound OK to you now, you should not sign because it will not end there.”
Latest News Stories
Trump promises ‘complete demolition’ in Iran as deadline looms
‘We leave no American behind’: President Trump details Easter rescue of downed airman
Michigan charges dentist in alleged ‘massive’ Medicaid fraud scheme
Illinois bill sparks debate over police privacy vs. public access
Signature process begins to ban large data centers in Ohio
U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear veteran’s benefits challenge
Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to Illinois public transport gun ban
Illinois Quick Hits: Report says Pekin Bowling Center ‘taxed out of business’
Tiffany vows to end subsidies for data centers in Wisconsin
JJC Trustee Alleges Board Exclusion, Discriminatory Policies During Tense Meeting
Firefighter age bill stalled despite union backing
County Board Members Pitch “Granny Flats,” Hobby Farm Zoning, and Farmland Mitigation in LRMP Brainstorm