MIT rejects White House education demands
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology refused to sign the White House agreement that would grant federal funds linked to the administration’s demands.
The Trump administration proposed a “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” to nine universities. The agreement offers special access to federal funding in exchange for commitments to eliminate racial discrimination in admissions and freeze tuition rates for the next five years, among other things.
The nine universities include: Brown University, the University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vanderbilt University, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Virginia and the University of Arizona.
The compact states the universities are not required to sign the document, but would lose federal grants if they didn’t.
MIT is the first university to refuse the demands. In a letter to the Education Secretary Linda McMahon, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced the decision.
“In our view, America’s leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence,” Kornbluth said. “In that free marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences. Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education.”
MIT will continue to support freedom of expression, the MIT president added.
“We must hear facts and opinions we don’t like — and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree,” Kornbluth wrote.
The American Association of University Professors is urging colleges to reject the proposed compact. Ariel White, vice president of MIT’s AAUP chapter, emphasized that universities should follow MIT’s lead and refuse to sign.
“The goal is to leave universities powerless and at the whim of the federal government and of the president personally and to make sure that universities cannot provide any sort of opposition to or simple disagreement with this administration,” White said. “Even if some individual parts of this deal sound OK to you now, you should not sign because it will not end there.”
Latest News Stories
Group Presents Allegations of 2024 Voter Roll Errors to County Board
Elementary PE Teacher Recognized for Raising Over Half a Million Dollars for Heart Health
Will County Board Advised on Strict “Judicial” Role Ahead of Landfill Expansion Application
Land Use Committee Rejects Shorewood Solar Farm Despite 25-Year Lease Offer
Trustees Renew Federal Lobbyist Contract Following $800,000 Funding Win
Executive Committee Advances $28.7 Million BNSF Bridge Project for Lorenzo Road
Land Use Committee: ‘Clean Fill’ Proposal Stalls After Unauthorized Tree Removal Sparks Environmental Concerns
Contracts Approved for New West Principal and District Technology Director
Board Member Clashes with Colleagues Over Meeting Minutes and Bill Review Transparency
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for February 17, 2026