Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Spread the love

Illinois has become the latest state to restrict the involvement of private equity and other non-lawyer interests in owning or running law firms, enacting legislation supporters say will help to protect the attorney-client relationship and wall off attorney fees from non-lawyers.

In the closing hours of the spring legislative session, Illinois lawmakers approved the legislation known as House Bill 5487.

In an unusual political alignment, the measure drew support from both the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which speaks for the state’s influential lawsuit filers, as well as from the group that normally lines up opposite them in court and on political issues, the Illinois Defense Counsel.

Both groups filed so-called witness slips before the Illinois General Assembly in support of HB 5487.

The measure is not yet law, as it must be signed by Gov. JB Pritzker.

Observers, however, say they expect HB5487 will win an easy endorsement from Pritzker.

The legislation explicitly places limits on the creation and use of so-called alternative business structures (ABS) and management services organizations (MSOs) in law firms.

The legislation defines ABS as a business arrangement which allows non-lawyers to own and lead law firms, and MSOs as an arrangement that gives non-lawyers and outside investors ownership interests in a law firm in exchange for providing certain business services to the firm.

HB 5487 doesn’t explicitly forbid law firms from working with MSOs.

But the legislation prohibits non-lawyers and outside investors from interfering in the “professional judgment of attorneys in representing clients; and

From “owning, or determining” or “revealing” client records and “attorney-client communications; and

From hiring or firing attorneys at the firm with which they may have a professional arrangement; and

Charging “any fee to the attorney or law firm that is directly, or indirectly based on the attorneys’ fees, revenues, or profits…”

The measure also would require law firms to disclose to clients if they have an MSO or ABS arrangement that may be still be allowed under state law.

The use of MSOs and ABS have become hot topics in the legal community in recent years.

Business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, have warned such arrangements would only deepen the involvement of investors in pushing and controlling lawsuits targeted at American companies.

For decades, an ever-growing investment industry have used so-called third party litigation funding to financially back lawsuits in pursuit of potential windfall profits from the funds paid by defendants to settle the lawsuits or under jury verdicts or other judgments.

Business groups and legal reform advocates have warned such outside financing not only warps the legal system, but also threatens the U.S. economy and national security.

So, these groups see the rise of legal services providers operating under ABS to be a new version of that threat, enabling even more direct involvement from private equity and venture capital seeking in the civil justice system.

On the other side, trial lawyers groups have also begun to oppose the use of ABS and MSOs, seeing them as an attempt by private investors to redefine the attorney-client relationship, wrest control of the lawsuit industry and grab a share of attorney fees, as well as the judgments.

As Illinois lawmakers moved this spring to take action, they followed in the path laid by other states, including California and Colorado. Those states passed legislation to address the rise of ABS arrangements in Arizona, which had brought private investment to bear on personal injury cases and other civil actions.

The Arizona ABS system has come under criticism for lack of oversight and financial conflicts of interest, among other critiques.

That system had notably allowed at least one prominent California mass tort firm, Wisner Baum, to spin off some of its business to the ABS known as Eleos Law in Arizona. According to reports, Eleos is 46% owned by non-lawyers and is funded, in part, through 5% of Wisner Baum’s attorney fees.

Eleos reportedly has helped to manage 9,400 lawsuits over alleged injuries caused by the heartburn medication Zantac and 8,450 lawsuits over alleged contamination of baby food.

Such instances helped to spur the legislation in Illinois, as well.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association did not issue public statements declaring their support for the legislation or explaining their reasons for registering support for the measure at the General Assembly this spring.

However, the legislation drew the support from some of ITLA’s most prominent legislative allies, including State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, and from Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch.

On the Illinois Defense Counsel side, attorney Dan Cotter, of the firm of Aronberg Goldgehn, of Chicago, said the IDC and ITLA together backed the measure because of its “foundational” nature to “the legal profession.”

Cotter and his colleague, Daniel Patrick Eckler, each entered witness slips before the General Assembly in support of HB 5487. Eckler declined comment, directing questions to Cotter.

Cotter said all sides agreed on the “broader issue of maintaining traditional roles” within the legal system and maintaining “public confidence in the legal system,” by requiring some level of transparency surrounding firm ownership and investor relationships.

Cotter said it was particularly important to address possible ABS-style fee sharing arrangements and to limit non-lawyer control over litigation and limit non-lawyer investor interference in the attorney-client relationship.

Cotter said the lines drawn in the new legislation notably still allow for the involvement of non-lawyer capital investors in the legal business, as long as they don’t interfere with the lawyers’ “professional judgment” in handling cases or law firm business decisions.

“But they can still do a lot of things they are doing,” Cotter said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Joliet-Junior-college.-Graphic-Logo.2

JJC Embarks on New 10-15 Year Facilities Master Plan Process

Joliet Junior College is laying the groundwork for its physical future, officially launching a comprehensive process to create a new facilities master plan that will guide campus development for the...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Library Board of Trustees for June 24, 2025

The Library Board of Trustees unanimously approved its annual working budget after amending the family programs line to $25,000. The board is also moving forward with long-term financial planning, having...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary: Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees for June 25, 2025

The Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees met on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. Key actions included the approval of the fiscal year 2026 budget after a contentious debate and hearing...
Mokena Logo Graphic.5

Mokena Enacts Local Grocery Tax to Avert $850,000 Revenue Loss

The Mokena Village Board has moved to preserve a crucial revenue stream, unanimously approving a new local grocery tax to replace state-collected funds that will disappear in 2026. The move...
Mokena Logo Graphic.6

Mokena Dissolves Two Committees to Streamline Development Process

In a bid to become more business-friendly, the Village of Mokena is dissolving two of its long-standing advisory committees to accelerate the process for new development. Mayor George J. Metanias...
Mokena Police Logo Graphic

Mokena Police to Get New Axon In-Car Cameras in $176K Deal

The Mokena Police Department is set to receive a significant technology upgrade after the Village Board approved a five-year, $176,526 contract with Axon Enterprise for a new in-car video system....
Callery Pear trees

Mokena Targets Invasive Callery Pear Trees for Removal

The Village of Mokena is taking proactive steps to improve its urban forest by removing dozens of invasive Callery Pear trees from public parkways, funded in part by a grant...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Mokena Village Board for June 23, 2025

The Mokena Village Board took several major actions at its June 23 meeting, including approving a new local grocery tax to head off a projected $850,000 revenue loss after the...
mokena school district 159.4

Mokena 159 Board Approves Amended Budget Amid Transparency, Deficit Concerns

The Mokena School District 159 Board of Education approved an amended budget for fiscal year 2025 in a contentious 6-1 vote Wednesday night, following sharp criticism from a board member...
mokena school district 159.3

Mokena 159 Board Signals Support for Recording Meetings After Public Push

Following requests from several residents, the Mokena School District 159 Board of Education on Wednesday discussed and expressed broad support for recording and publicly posting its meetings to increase transparency....
Wayfinder

District 159 Adopts ‘Wayfinder’ Program to Boost Middle Schoolers’ Social-Emotional Health

Mokena Junior High School students will have a new curriculum focused on social-emotional learning (SEL) next year after the Board of Education unanimously approved the adoption of the "Wayfinder" program....
mokena school district 159.3

Mokena 159 Principals Report End-of-Year Academic Progress, Focus on Writing

Principals from Mokena School District 159 presented their end-of-year School Improvement Plan (SIP) updates to the Board of Education on Wednesday, highlighting student progress with a particular focus on improving...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Mokena School District 159 for June 18, 2025

The Mokena School District 159 Board of Education met on June 18, 2025. The board approved an amended budget for the upcoming fiscal year after significant debate. It also signaled...
Will-County-Board-Meeting-June-18-2025

Will County Board Halts Transportation Plan After Contentious 143rd Street Debate

The Will County Board voted Wednesday to send its five-year, multi-million dollar transportation improvement plan back to committee, effectively pausing all projects after a lengthy and heated debate over the...
Will-County-Board-Meeting-June-18-2025

Will County Board Upholds Zoning Denials, Rejecting Developer Appeals

The Will County Board on Wednesday backed its Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC), denying two separate appeals from property owners who sought to overturn the commission’s recommendations against their projects....