High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

Spread the love

After a $3.5 billion contract was awarded for track and electrical work on California’s high-speed rail, critics are calling the entire project problematic because of a lack of transparency.

It’s the latest criticism of a delayed project that is costing taxpayers more than $100 billion in additional costs.

The firm Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog won the contract approved at Tuesday’s High-Speed Rail Authority meeting. That firm won out over one other bidder, which was ruled out because that firm didn’t meet all the requirements set out by the state agency.

No one from Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog responded to The Center Square’s request for comment on Friday.

According to a presentation from the meeting earlier this week, $118.1 million will pay for design, acquiring materials and doing pre-construction work, among other facets of the project. Roughly $260 million will pay for engineering work, laying track and construction – totaling about $378.9 million to start laying down tracks.

Other facets covered by the contract include an overhead contact system and traction power, train control and communications systems.

“The bottom line is, I think we should pull the plug on this whole thing,” state Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, told The Center Square on Friday afternoon. “The fact is that they’re moving forward without a realistic plan. Even the inspector general said the plan, moving forward, is unrealistic.”

Strickland said he is concerned the high-speed rail doesn’t have the money on hand to follow through on construction and be built the way it was proposed almost 20 years ago.

“They have major cash flow issues and major funding issues,” Strickland said. “The fact that they’re willing to move forward and waste billions of dollars on a project that I believe will never be built as proposed for the people of California, I think, is irresponsible.”

Some board members had concerns this week about designating so much money to paying for various phases of the continued construction of high-speed rail, especially with the $3.5 billion going to just one company. However, High-Speed Rail Authority staff said during the meeting that walking away from working with a contractor was “not desirable.”

“We’re invested and our partners are invested in getting this project right,” Ed Fenn, chief of construction at the High-Speed Rail Authority, said during the meeting. “We have a lot of institutional knowledge as far as what costs and schedules should be, and we have experts to help us ensure that we have competitive pricing going forward.”

An official from The High-Speed Rail Authority said on Friday via email that while the 119-mile segment that runs through the Central Valley will be electrified and ready to test after work is complete, it will start operations at a later date.

“It will not be operational yet,” Micah Flores, public relations manager for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, told The Center Square. “Certification, train-set testing and other pre‑revenue activities still need to occur. This segment is part of the 171-mile operating line between Merced and Bakersfield, which is planned to begin passenger service in 2033.”

So far, the high-speed rail project is estimated to cost $126.2 billion, much more than the $9.95 billion bond that California voters approved in 2008, according to previous reporting by The Center Square. The complete high-speed rail was supposed to be finished in 2020.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

frankfort-school-district-161.1

Summit Hill School Board Reverses Controversial Principal Non-Renewal Decision

In a significant reversal, the Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education voted to repeal previous resolutions that aimed to not renew the contract of an unnamed principal, effectively...
frankfort-school-district-161.2-e1754272831494

Meeting Briefs: Summit Hill School District 161 for June 11, 2025

The Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education made several major decisions at its June 11 meeting, including the hiring of a School Resource Officer for two schools after...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Will County to Draft New Harassment Policy Amid Debate Over Board Authority

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee will draft a new, county-wide general harassment policy after a lengthy debate on Tuesday revealed the complexities of the county’s legal obligations and...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Committee Uncovers Gaps in County Asset Tracking, Calls for Better System

A review of Will County’s fiscal policies on Tuesday highlighted significant gaps in how the county tracks its physical assets, from office furniture to squad cars, prompting calls from the...
frankfort-park-district

Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules

The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it "cannot be...
Meeting-Briefs

In Brief: Ordinance Review Committee Actions

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met June 10 to continue its comprehensive update of the county code. Here are some of the key actions and discussions: Court Fees...
frankfort-park-district.1

Frankfort Park District Kicks Off Busy Summer Season with Races and New Events

The Frankfort Park District is in full summer swing, with a packed schedule of programs and events that includes an expanded day camp, new community parties, and the 25th anniversary...
Mokena Logo Graphic.3

Mokena Approves FY 2026 Budget, Funds Major Infrastructure and Technology Upgrades

The Mokena Village Board unanimously adopted its Fiscal Year 2026 budget on Monday, approving a financial plan that directs major funding toward road resurfacing, storm sewer replacements, and a comprehensive...
Mokena Logo Graphic.1

Mokena Residents to See Higher Water and Sewer Bills

Residents will soon be paying more for water and sewer services after the Mokena Village Board approved rate increases for the new fiscal year. The board voted unanimously on June...
Mokena Logo Graphic.5

Mokena Renews Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract at Reduced Cost

The Village of Mokena has extended its traffic signal maintenance contract for another year, securing the service at a lower cost after the number of signals under its jurisdiction was...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Mokena Village Board for June 9, 2025

The Mokena Village Board on June 9 adopted its budget for the 2026 fiscal year, a plan that includes significant spending on infrastructure and technology, and also approved utility rate...
Will-County-Jail-e1750123778582

Will County Jail Faces Major Staffing Crisis as 70 Employees Eligible to Retire by 2030

County officials warn of potential budget impact as adult detention facility grapples with unprecedented turnover Will County's adult detention facility is heading toward a staffing crisis that could significantly impact...
will-county-board.3

Will County Health Department Reports Sharp Decline in Overdose Deaths

2025 fatalities running 40% lower than previous year, officials attribute success to expanded Narcan distribution Will County is experiencing a significant reduction in overdose deaths, with 2025 fatalities running 40%...
will-county-board

Will County Health Department Faces Funding Uncertainty as Federal Grants Under Review

Multiple revenue sources threatened as department seeks legislative support for public health programs Will County Health Department officials are closely monitoring potential federal funding cuts that could impact multiple programs...

Will County Land Use Meeting Briefs

LAND USE ACTIONS Accessory Dwelling Unit Rules Modified: The committee recommended approval of text amendments allowing accessory dwelling units to exceed current building area limitations in certain circumstances. The changes...