Supreme Court affirms Washington venue in falsification trial
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision on Thursday, ruled that an individual charged with falsification of a document, must be tried in the district where the falsification occurred.
The case, Abouammo v. U.S., focused on Ahmed Abouammo, an employee at Twitter’s San Francisco office who provided confidential information about Saudi dissidents to a high-level Saudi official. He used information obtained through his job at Twitter to aid the Saudi official in tracking the dissidents and was paid $300,000.
Abouammo later moved to Seattle, where FBI agents confronted him on charges of acting as a foreign agent. He denied the accusations and provided a false invoice to claim he received the payment for consulting work.
He was charged in the Northern District of California on falsification and acting as a foreign agent. Abouammo argued he could not be charged in California because the falsification happened in Seattle.
Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Abouammo. Justice Elena Kagan said the Constitution safeguards a defendant’s rights to a proper venue.
“The only prohibited act is the falsification of a document; once a person has committed that act with the requisite intent, he need do nothing more to violate the law,” Kagan wrote in the court’s majority opinion. “Because the only proscribed conduct is falsification, venue must be where falsification occurred.”
Even though Abouammo provided information to a foreign official in California, Kagan argued the charges of falsification were only relevant in Washington. She said the trial could only proceed in Washington if it focused on falsification charges.
“The trial should not have occurred in the Northern District of California because no ‘conduct constituting the offense’ happened in that location,” Kagan wrote.
In 2022, Abouammo was sentenced to 42 months in prison for acting as a foreign agent.
The case will likely go back to lower courts where Abouammo will be tried in the Western District of Washington on the specific falsification charges.
Latest News Stories
What’s on the table for Trump’s meeting with Putin?
WATCH: Illinois In Focus Daily | Friday Aug. 15th, 2025
Illinois quick hits: Ex-student sentenced for school gun, time served; fall semester beginning
Report Finding Few Trucks Littering Sparks Debate on Cleanup Responsibility
Illinois quick hits: Search continues for Gibson City suspect; manufacturing declines since 2000
WATCH: Map debate, case against Texas Democrats continues in Illinois
WATCH: Illinois GOP State Fair rally takes aim at Pritzker, ‘woke agenda’
WATCH: Small business group: Pritzker-signed bills are wrong move
WATCH: Illinois In Focus Daily | Thursday Aug. 14th, 2025
Chicago’s commercial property taxes spike to twice national city average
Illinois quick hits: Court rejects lawsuit against Texas Democrats; no charges for police
Illinois judge rejects Texas legislature lawsuit over absconding Dems