Supreme Court affirms Washington venue in falsification trial
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision on Thursday, ruled that an individual charged with falsification of a document, must be tried in the district where the falsification occurred.
The case, Abouammo v. U.S., focused on Ahmed Abouammo, an employee at Twitter’s San Francisco office who provided confidential information about Saudi dissidents to a high-level Saudi official. He used information obtained through his job at Twitter to aid the Saudi official in tracking the dissidents and was paid $300,000.
Abouammo later moved to Seattle, where FBI agents confronted him on charges of acting as a foreign agent. He denied the accusations and provided a false invoice to claim he received the payment for consulting work.
He was charged in the Northern District of California on falsification and acting as a foreign agent. Abouammo argued he could not be charged in California because the falsification happened in Seattle.
Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Abouammo. Justice Elena Kagan said the Constitution safeguards a defendant’s rights to a proper venue.
“The only prohibited act is the falsification of a document; once a person has committed that act with the requisite intent, he need do nothing more to violate the law,” Kagan wrote in the court’s majority opinion. “Because the only proscribed conduct is falsification, venue must be where falsification occurred.”
Even though Abouammo provided information to a foreign official in California, Kagan argued the charges of falsification were only relevant in Washington. She said the trial could only proceed in Washington if it focused on falsification charges.
“The trial should not have occurred in the Northern District of California because no ‘conduct constituting the offense’ happened in that location,” Kagan wrote.
In 2022, Abouammo was sentenced to 42 months in prison for acting as a foreign agent.
The case will likely go back to lower courts where Abouammo will be tried in the Western District of Washington on the specific falsification charges.
Latest News Stories
Will County Public Works Committee Shelves License Plate Reader Agreement Amid Bipartisan Privacy Concerns
Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Overrides Staff to Approve New Lenox Accessory Building Variance
Will County Sheriff’s Office Welcomes Remi, First Electronic Scent Detection Dog
Will County Transportation Department Announces Open House for Manhattan-Monee Road Expansion
Will County Community Mental Health Board Faces $5 Million Shortfall in 2026 Grant Requests
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Public Health & Safety Committee for March 5, 2026
Will County Officials Warn of Zoom Court Scam Targeting Defendants for Fraudulent Dismissal Fees
Will Land Use Committee Evaluates Multi-Million Dollar Buyout for Flooded Harris Drive Homes
Behavioral Health Division Drops Wait Times, Reports Zero Opioid Deaths in February
Harris Drive Residents Plead for County Intervention Amid Failing Septic Systems and Flooding
Will County Sheriff’s Office Investigates Fatal Hit-and-Run in Homer Glen
Federal Funding Freezes Threaten Will County Public Health Programs Amid Ongoing Lawsuits