Lawsuit claims digital asset tax is unconstitutional
(The Center Square) – According to a lawsuit filed in Sangamon County court, a new, first-in-the-nation digital asset tax in Illinois violates both the U.S. and state constitutions.
The Digital Chamber filed the complaint against Illinois Department of Revenue Director David Harris and Attorney General Kwame Raoul over the tax scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, 2027.
Bellementis law firm partner Olta Andoni said the 0.2% tax on every digital asset is unconstitutional under the uniformity clause in Illinois.
“The tax classifies by record-keeping technology, so it’s not addressed on any real and substantial difference between the assets. Second of all, there is some due process implication here because the tax is very vague,” Andoni told The Center Square.
The Digital Chamber’s complaint said the tax imposes an unfair burden, even though Andoni said 0.2% may not sound like much.
“When you consider that this is going to be applicable to every single transaction in digital asset, that definitely turns to be quite impactful for a majority of the businesses,” Andoni said, adding that is the first in the nation with such implications.
Under U.S. law, Andoni invoked the dormant commerce clause and 14th Amendment due process.
“The most important count claim that we address is under the Internet Tax Freedom Act that pretty much preempts the tax as a discriminatory tax on electronic commerce,” Andoni said.
The tax is part of the revenue package signed by Gov. J.B. Pritzker last month.
Senate Bill 3019 was originally an agricultural financing measure, but the text was gutted and replaced with the 1,623-page revenue document during the final hours of the legislative session this spring.
Less than a week after Pritzker signed the revenue package, state Rep. John Cabello, R-Machesney Park, filed House Bill 5798 to immediately repeal the digital asset tax.
“I don’t believe any other state has this, and yes, it’s very punitive,” Cabello told The Center Square.
Cabello also said the measure was meant to generate $60 million or more in new revenue for the state.
The Digital Chamber said its members are already incurring costs by trying to comply with the new tax before it takes effect.
Andoni said, as far as she is aware, the Illinois Department of Revenue has issued no implementation guide or guidance.
“The suit was just filed and any comments at this time would be premature,” said IDOR Director David Harris in a statement provided to The Center Square.
Latest News Stories
Powell out, Warsh in as new chair of Federal Reserve
Nessel pushes back as Trump administration extends order keeping coal plant open
Bipartisan praise for federal charges in Minnesota fraud cases
Congress rejects Trump’s proposed NASA budget cuts
Comptroller, Chicago officials debate tax fund sweeps
No public funds for new transit safety group
The future of American troops in Europe; Iran lead Rubio’s meeting with NATO
Tennessee congressman files articles of impeachment against Roberts
Illinois Quick Hits: Chicagoland chamber opposes ditigal ad tax
Board suspends Camp Mystic co-owner’s nursing license
Illinois bill banning ‘easily convertible’ handguns could pass this session
Deadline approaches for $1 million school choice award
Biometrics privacy law’s territorial reach limited, appeals court says
Watchdog says Biden Education Department defied court order on Title IX enforcement