Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules
The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it “cannot be dictated by the HOA” on how a park parcel within the subdivision is developed.
The issue came to light during the park board’s June 10, 2025, meeting, where Executive Director Gina Hassett informed commissioners that a proposed settlement agreement with the HOA was not yet ready for a vote. She revealed that the district’s attorneys are actively working on a solution to a foundational conflict: the park district’s land is currently included in the HOA’s governing declaration, which could subject public park development to private association rules.
According to Hassett, the district is pursuing a path to have the Five Oaks HOA remove the park district property from its declaration entirely. A key part of the strategy is to achieve this “without paying to have it removed,” putting the onus on the association to amend its own governing documents.
The core of the dispute centers on the autonomy of a public government entity versus a private one. Park districts typically follow their own master plans, public input, and board directives when developing parks and facilities. Being bound by an HOA’s covenants could potentially restrict the types of amenities, building materials, or even the timeline for developing the park land, which is intended for public use.
During the meeting, a discussion was held among the board members and staff, but no formal action was taken as the matter remains in the hands of legal counsel. The outcome of the negotiations could have broader implications for how the park district interacts with other HOAs where public park land is situated within a private residential development.
The board expressed its support for the staff’s direction, signaling a unified front in protecting the district’s authority over its own property and ensuring that future development is guided by public interest rather than private covenants. Further updates are expected as the settlement negotiations progress.
Latest News Stories
“Federal Policy Uncertainty” Blamed for Delay of Peotone Solar Farm; County Grants Second Extension
Will County Grants Extensions to Five Solar Projects Sold to New Developers
Will County Board Approves Controversial Drug Recovery Retreat in Crete Township
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Mokena Village Board for September 15, 2025
Mokena Board Approves Final Plat for 50-Home Boulder Ridge Phase IV Subdivision
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Mokena Village Board for September 8, 2025
Mokena Board Greenlights Boulder Ridge Development Settlement
Mokena Appoints Jacob Hazek as New Village Arborist
Mokena Awards Nearly $300,000 in Contracts for Road Maintenance and Project Oversight
Mokena Board Approves Sweeping Increases to Police Ticket Fines
‘Glaring failure:’ lawmaker accuses Meta of failing to make AI chatbots kid-safe
Supreme Court allows ICE to factor race, workplace into L.A. raids