WATCH: Chicago activist testifies; Quinn’s millionaire surcharge; High SNAP error rate
(The Center Square) – In today’s edition of Illinois in Focus Daily, The Center Square Editor Greg Bishop shares highlights from Wednesday U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary where Chicago Flips Red Vice President Daniel Carter-Walters testified about immigration enforcement in the Windy City.
Bishop also gives both sides of the debate around a proposed 3% surcharge on Illinois millionaires to fund property tax relief rebates. Former Gov. Pat Quinn says if voters approve the idea, more than $4 billion would be raised. Republican U.S. Senate candidate Don Tracy said that will push more high earners out of the state.
Finally, Bishop shares some of the questions and responses around the state’s handling of federal tax subsidies through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Illinois’ high SNAP error rate could end up costing Illinois taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
Subscribe to Illinois in Focus Daily with The Center Square on YouTube. You can also subscribe to the Illinois in Focus podcast to get the entire show uninterrupted.
Community Events
Latest News Stories
Policy experts unimpressed with SBA’s ‘record’ capital delivered to small businesses
City taxpayer burden swells, as Chicago pension debt rises
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Mokena Community Public Library District Board of Trustees for August 2025
Poll: Voters like candidates supporting war on Alzheimer’s
U.S. LNG exports at new record in September on strong Louisiana shipments
Conservatives push Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger
Hamas agrees to release hostages; demands further negotiations
Report: Bipartisan support for K-12 open enrollment policy
WATCH: U.S. military strikes another suspected drug boat, killing four
‘End the political idiocy’: Republicans lambast Dems for tanking funding bill again
Des Moines Public School system hired superintendent with extensive criminal history
Pro-life group calls FDA’s approval of generic abortion pill ‘unconscionable’