
Will County to Draft New Harassment Policy Amid Debate Over Board Authority
The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee will draft a new, county-wide general harassment policy after a lengthy debate on Tuesday revealed the complexities of the county’s legal obligations and the limits of the County Board’s authority over other elected officials.
The discussion arose during a review of Chapter 39 of the county’s ordinances, which contains the state-mandated sexual harassment policy. Board Member Dan Butler proposed broadening the policy’s title and scope from “sexual harassment” to a general “harassment policy,” arguing the county’s required training course covers a much wider range of protected classes, including veterans and pregnant women.
“I was surprised that it included a lot of groups other than just men and women of a sexual nature,” Butler said. “I just thought our policy should reflect that… to bring a broader understanding of what we’re trying to accomplish.”
However, Phil Mock of the Will County State’s Attorney’s Office, who is guiding the committee’s review, advised against altering the existing policy. He explained that state law specifically mandates a standalone “Sexual Harassment Policy,” and changing the title could put the county out of compliance.
“The reason we use that term is because the state mandated us to use that term,” Mock said. “We don’t want to be in a situation where they said, ‘You just have a general harassment policy, you don’t have a sexual harassment policy.'”
This prompted a deeper conversation about the board’s power to set policy for the entire county. Member Judy Ogalla questioned why some ordinances apply county-wide while others do not. Mock described the county government structure as a “feudal system with a bunch of dukes and not one king,” where each elected official—like the Sheriff, County Clerk, or Coroner—maintains control over their office’s internal operations.
He clarified that the County Board’s authority is strongest on fiscal matters. Policies with direct financial implications, like those concerning insurance benefits or purchasing, are binding. Policies on workplace conditions, however, are largely followed voluntarily by other elected officials.
“As a county voice you can say that,” Mock said, suggesting a separate anti-harassment policy would likely be adopted by other officials. “My belief is all the elected officials will voluntarily follow your policy because that makes it easy on them. They don’t have to make their own up.”
Ultimately, the committee voted to direct Mock to draft a new, separate general harassment policy to be added to Chapter 39. The policy will address protections for various classes as defined by state law and court interpretations. Due to the addition of this new section and other required changes, the committee voted to postpone final approval of Chapter 39 until its next meeting.
Latest News Stories

Meeting Summary: New Lenox Board of Trustees for July 14, 2025

Crete Township Wins Approval for New Digital Sign at Community Center

Will County Planners OK Oversized Garage Near Naperville, Overriding Staff Recommendation

Green Garden Landscaping Business Gains Permit Amid Strong Neighbor Support

Meeting Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for July 15, 2025

Mokena Overhauls Zoning Code to Streamline Rules for Sheds, Pools, and Patios

Frankfort Approves ‘Whisk & Flame’ Culinary Studio, Slashes Parking Requirement for Downtown Property

Frankfort Village Board Adopts $59.4 Million Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2026

Mokena Awards $472K Contract for Countryview Estates Storm Sewer Project

Frankfort Establishes New Zoning Rules to Attract Data Centers

Fiber Internet Provider Pavlov Media Details Plans to Expand into Mokena

Currie Motors Expansion Gets Approval with Site Modifications
